| Newsgroups |
gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <yahoo@g...>
wrote:
> From w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/: "An Alt container is intended to have
at
> least one member, identified by the property rdf:_1. This member is
> intended to be considered as the default or preferred value. Other
than
> the member identified as rdf:_1, the order of the remaining
elements is
> not significant."
Thanks!
Looks like we need to have our own "Alt" container.
> For enclosures it could be useful to have a "q" value anloguos to
the
> q-parameter in http-accept header, this would be more flexible than
> defining the quality by the order of the elements. For example this
> would allow to express that two alternatives have the same quality
and
> make it easier to find an algorithm for the client to choose the
best
> variant.
Or use "q" value in regular "Alt" container.
Both approaches looks good to me. What people think about it?
Q is adds little more burden, but allows to specify that 2
enclosures have same fairness to orginal. Plus it allows us
to use standard "Alt" container. Our own container is easier
to use, since element ordering is specifying fairness to original,
without special property. The problem is that there is no way
to specify how close to values are, and if they are equally fair
to the original.
> > It it does, we would use
> > "rdf:Alt". If not we will define "enc1:Alt". For "parallel"
> > we will define "enc1:Parallel".
>
> I would suggest to start the IDs for classes with an uppercase
letter,
> as it is becoming more common to mix different RDF-vocabularies
there is
> less reason to be like RSS (i hope RSS 1.1 will change this and
avoid
> having terms that are both property and class).
Yes, actually I changed did that.
I will send new version today.
Sincerely,
Vadim
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/