Re: Re: mod_enclosures proposal
Danny Ayers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:55:42 +0100, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, why should the "simple" xml crowd choose RSS 1.0 anyway? Because it's (out) there - most desktop aggregators do support RSS 1.0, many publishers too, even if there's no general RDF in sight. I suspect this is declining though, following an astonishing amount of publicity for RSS 2.0 and Atom and, well, practically zero for RSS 1.0. As a lot of this data is already being published/consumed, it would be nice to make good use of it (IMHO). On the other side you cannot just use > RDF-Vocabularies without writing a document about their serialization > in RSS-feed and proposing this to the community. Both make it hard to > just write that tiny nice killer-app. True. But I'm sure there's still plenty of low-hanging fruit in the region of syndication+RDF (has been for a few years now...). Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/