Re: RSS 1.1
Danny Ayers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:26:19 +0000, Leigh Dodds <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm disappointed that the RSS 1.1 RDF/OWL schema doesn't make any > reference to the RSS 1.0 classes and properties. Wouldn't this have > been a nice demonstration of RDF format evolution? Yes. This would definitely make a worthwhile addition. I argued a bit with Mark Pilgrim over his characterization as RSS 0.9 and 1.0 as being (mutually) incompatible in his classic "The myth of RSS compatibility" [1]. In retrospect I think he's probably right, because there isn't actually a schema relating 0.9 to 1.0. If you included RSS 0.9 in a 1.0/1.1 mapping schema, you could actually *reduce* the number of incompatible format out there by introducing 1.1 ;-) Cheers, Danny. [1] http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/02/04/incompatible-rss -- http://dannyayers.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/