Re: Re: OWL and RSS 1.0

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:31:49 -0000, Jon Hanna <jon-YK+g4hZFQDMeIZ0/[email protected]> wrote:
> > Summary: expect mappings from RSS 1.0 to RSS 1.1, as popularly
> > requested, in the next draft (which'll hopefully be on Monday).
> 
> There remains a good reason NOT to reference 1.0 from 1.1, the confusing way
> 1.0's model has some terms used for both predicates and classes should
> perhaps be broken away from.

Yep, I think Sean might have it about right when talking about the
normative ontology being DL or Lite but looking at things through
informative XSLT spectacles when going from 10 to 1.1.

I do think clear advice on how to map/merge feeds should be given,
this is likely to be an immediate need for anyone wishing to consume
1.1. Translating from RSS 2.0 to RDF is relatively easy because
there's just a simple, very loosely-specified domain model to work
from. All hail XSLT. But with RSS 1.0 documents having an RDF model
already, well, it's a bit lumpier. But I *will* have 1.0 items
alongside 1.1 items in a triplestore - how do I run queries that will
work sensibly across both?

Cheers,
Danny. 


-- 

http://dannyayers.com


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/