Re: RSS 1.1 bugfix?
Danny Ayers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:27:11 -0500, Christopher Schmidt <crschmidt-ShfR2DvLQHoeIZ0/[email protected]> wrote: > The RSS 1.0 namespace is in violation of the OWL specification, because > it uses image as both a class and a property, which OWL prohibits. By > using the same namespace, the mistake is carried forward, and can not be > corrected. In addition, it would serve to further confuse the issue on > what kind of RSS is being read: if it were to use the same namespace, > how would one know if they were parsing RSS 1.0 or 1.1? The same argument could be applied to pretty much any conflict between RSS 1.0 and a fixed version. There will be incompatibilities. But if the intension is just a bugfix, then maybe it would be possible to reuse the same namespace generally, with a different namespace for troublesome terms like rss:image? But if the use of image as both a property and a class is considered a bug, then wouldn't it be better still strongly deprecate the use of image as a property (or class), as a bugfix? The problem of dealing with the 1.0 legacy isn't going to go away by creating a whole new vocabulary in a different namespace without close to 100% adoption. That seems unlikely in the immediate future, so an explicit acknowledgement of the problem(s) and recommended interpretations (which may differ from the RSS 1.0 spec) would seem an appropriate way of bridging. There is another alternative - if this is to be an ontologically clean revision of RSS, a new vocabulary in a different namespace, then why not re-present it as Simple OWL Syndication (or somesuch). The upgrade path could still be marked from RSS 1.0, the RSS 1.1 name could still be used for the rough-n-ready version, but there would be more explicit acknowledgement that the new version it *is* a different vocabulary, albeit for the same application domain. > > > Like the format though, much cleaner. > > > > So do I, well done! +1 Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/