Re: summary

"Vadim Zaliva" <[email protected]> Fri, 01 Apr 2005 23:34:08 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

What I particularly like in RSS1 is that it easily extendable.
There are may be more uses to it than you or I could imagine.
 
In my particular case, I have an application where I would like 
to have short and long item summary. Before inventing something 
new, I am just asking the community if there is anything already 
for this. I do not suggest to add this to RSS spec and I do not 
force other people to use this.

Vadim


--- In [email protected], "2RSS.com" <rss@2...> wrote:
> RS[S] stands for really simple. I like the idea to have only a short
> description. Why to complicate the problem with a short summary of 2
lines
> and a longer content of 3-4 lines? A unique description I really
think is
> enough, not shorter description, longer description and very long
> description + maybe a special description for those who want this
option. :)
> Let's keep it simple.
> 
> 2RSS.com
> 
> > --- In [email protected], "Bill Kearney" <ml_yahoo@i...>
wrote:
> >
> > No, RSS description is more like atom:content.
> > The idea is that I want to have types of content in the Item:
> >
> > 1. short summary
> > 2. longer content
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Vadim
> >
> >
> >
> > > In the context of an item it's the <description> element.  It's
> > likewise the
> > > same name in the channel.  Or is that sufficient for the sort of
> > data you're
> > > handling?
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Vadim Zaliva" <lord@c...>
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am looking for a way to express in RSS1 something similar to
ATOM
> > > > "summary" field. Here is definition from ATOM spec:
> > > >
> > > >     The "atom:summary" element is a Content construct that
> > > >     conveys a short summary, abstract or excerpt of the entry.
> > > >
> > > > Base spec does not have anything like that. I do not see
anything in
> > > > Dublin Core module. Any suggestions how can I express this
using some
> > > > exiting module? Of course I can always create new module,
which is the
> > > > path I am trying to avoid.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/