Re: enclosure status?
"Vadim Zaliva" <[email protected]> Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:08:30 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], Lucas Gonze <lgonze@p...> wrote: Lucas, While I would love to have my proposal accepted as "winner", I must admit that no consensus have been reached on that. I think it never will until we see actual implementations, and then market will decide. I am using my proposal in some project on which I am working on right now, which I plan to announce to public this month. Then it would be up to RSS aggregators vendors to decide to support it or not. Also we are working on implementation of my proposal for Informa library which we will submit as patch to Informa maintainers. If accepted it would make it easy for people to implement our proposal. Sincerely, Vadim > >> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Lucas Gonze wrote: > >>> What's the status of enclosures in RSS 1.0? Thanks. > > > --- In [email protected], Lucas Gonze <lgonze@p...> wrote: > >> Now that I look around a little more, I think that the issue is the > >> status > >> of support for any of the proposals for enclosures in 1.0. In > >> particular, > >> what syntax, if any, do feed readers support for enclosures in 1.0 > >> feeds? > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Suzan Foster wrote: > > AFAIK none. Especially among the podcatcher community there seems to > > be no incentive to implement anything other than rss 2.0 applications. > > That rings true to me. Ok, it's easy enough to fix if the issue is well > known. > > What practical steps would help? > > Podcatcher devs need to know that there is consensus on how to do this > among the RSS 1.0 contributors. Am I right in thinking that the Krokodile > proposal is the winner, and that it has moderate consensus behind it? Is > it possible that core RSS 1.0 contributors have reached consensus but not > publicized it? > > Whatever the consensus is, it needs documentation. There should be a > tutorial, an XML.com article, and sample code. > > It also needs tools. The universal feed parser should support it, > whatever's in CPAN for RSS 1.0 should support it, Magpie needs a > patch. > > It is also possible for RSS 1.0 contributors to modify the FOSS > podcatchers themselves. iPodder is GPL. > > - Lucas Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/