Re: Re: enclosure status?
"Bill Kearney" <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:29:35 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.ideaspace.net/users/wkearney/foaf.xrdf |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Vadim,
>
> > While I would love to have my proposal accepted as "winner", I must
> > admit that no consensus have been reached on that. I think it never
> > will until we see actual implementations, and then market will decide.
>
> Well, let's get there. IMO the only blocking factor is battle fatigue.
>
> Something that would be helpful in reaching a consensus is a comparison
> between your proposal and Suzan's, the terser and more neutral the better.
I agree with Lucas. The simpler the better, but no simpler. Let's not run
afoul of the mistakes of being myopical like the 2.0 form and let's also
steer somewhere short of the typical RDF verbosity that always seems to
creep up.
-Bill Kearney
Syndic8.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/