bittorrent

Ok, so how to deal with BitTorrents?  Proposals are:

1) blow it off
2) use Vadim's transport concept[1]
3) others?

- Lucas

[1] http://www.crocodile.org/lord/RSSenclosures/node11.html#transportv


On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Vadim Zaliva wrote:

>
>
> --- In [email protected], Lucas Gonze <lgonze@p...> wrote:
>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Vadim Zaliva wrote:
>> Can we merge these two proposals, so that there is a minimal syntax
> based
>> on Suzan's model and a maximal syntax based on yours?  I strongly agree
>
> I think our minimal syntax is almost identical to Suzan's model.
> All the fluff is optional.
>
> However if somebody have any other, better merging suggestions, I am
> very open to them.
>> About Bittorrent in particular, that's a tough nut to crack because
> BT is
>> so contrary to web architecture.  There must be prior art for
> indirection
>> of that kind, though.  ?
>
> Yeah, it is tough. After some duscussions mailing lists and in person
> with other people I think we came up with reasolable solution in our
> proposal, which avoids creating specific element for just this
> protocol (like was suggested for RSS 2.0), keeps most of the syntax of
> 'enclosure' element, allows to be reused for other simmilar protocols
> and preserves all enclosure meta-info like type and size.
>
> Sincerely,
> Vadim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/