RE: licensing (was Re: Setting up a purl for rss/1.1

> Several possibilities exist.  If the RSS-DEV WG chooses to 
> adopt the proposal (and so far I'm personally open to this), 
> then the copyright could be assigned to the group and follow 
> the group's policies.

As another WG member I likewise would be willing to consider the proposal
and move toward encouraging it's use.

> Possibly better in any case would be to have the spec hosted 
> by the W3 as a Note as part of the Semantic Web Activity (I 
> don't think vocabularies should go the Rec route), assigning 
> the copyright to the W3.

I'm less inclined to support this notion if only to avoid adding yet another
layer to the process.  It's not a 'bad idea' but not necessarily one that's
all that necessary IMHO.

-Bill Kearney
Syndic8.com



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/