RE: Re: RSS 2.0 textInput element

> Message: 1         
>    Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:01:08 +0100
>    From: Danny Ayers <[email protected]>
>    Subject: Re: RSS 2.0 textInput element
> 
> Hi Clinton,
> 
> You may also be interested in the in-feed feedback approach 
> described at :
> 
> http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2005/12/14/putting-rss-to-work-immedi
> ate-action-feeds.html
> 
> Basically include (X)HTML forms in the *content* of the feed. 
> Mark Woodman calls it "Immediate Action". Because many 
> aggregators use full
> (-ish) HTML renderers for the content (irrespective of the 
> source feed format), this approach has a high level of 
> support without anybody actually thinking about it...
> 
> Cheers,
> Danny.
> 
> --
> 
> http://dannyayers.com
> 
> 
> Message: 2         
>    Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:56:48 -0000
>    From: "James Holderness" <[email protected]>
>   Subject: Re: RSS 2.0 textInput element
> 
> There are a number of RSS aggregators that strip FORM 
> elements from html content (looks like about 35% of my small 
> sample set). I was under the impression that this was for 
> security reasons, but I can't find anything to back that up 
> (other than that IE used to have a parsing bug in INPUT 
> elements that would cause it to explode). Anyone know what 
> the security implications are? Is it sensible or paranoid to 
> strip FORM elements?
> 
> Regards
> James

Thank you Danny and James. Any information regarding the use of 
the "unused" elements and any consequences for having done so can 
only be a good thing to learn. The next element to consider 
would be the cloud which I perceive as a way to use an XML Web 
Service to interact with the channel and its items.

<%= Clinton Gallagher



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/