Re: RSS Mime Type Obstacle
"Ken MacLeod" <ken-VbOJbV3qneKf+c8Povm/[email protected]> Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:34:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/5/06, rcade <rcade-/[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm reading the RFCs related to MIME types and the process to apply > for one. My read of Section 2.2.4 of RFC 2048 would exclude a joint application > for "application/rss+xml" by the RSS Advisory Board and RSS-DEV > Working Group (or any other shared type). > Does anyone else have a different take on this? > Circumstantial exception. Documenting current behavior. Write an RFC for the registration that clearly defines the interoperable behavior of agents that exchange formats of the "application/rss+xml" type. Note that they are all derived from the original format. Many RFCs that define a complete format include a MIME registration as part of the RFC. Other MIME registrations are simply boilerplate that point to an external format for the purpose of registering the MIME type. A combined RSS MIME registration would have one or two sections on defining the interoperable behavior of an RSS formatted document, and include the registration info. I don't think the RFC should attempt to "restate" the formats (with a nod here to Mark N. for the original RSS MIME registration draft). Simply point to the existing documents. They've been stable long enough to be referenced regardless of their lack of standards organization. A MIME registration of this type will likely only be considered an "Informational" RFC anyway. -- Ken [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/