Re: Where should remedial RSS 2.0 questions be directed?

As an unsuccessful author, I'll leave the copy (wording) to the 
successful authors (Rogers) on the list. I think he already has write 
access to the repository and can make the changes directly.
Thanks,

Randy Charles Morin
http://www.therssweblog.com


--- In [email protected], Sam Ruby <rubys@...> wrote:
>
> A while back, I switched the Feed Validator mailing list from 
> SourceForge to Google Groups in the hopes that it would address the 
> problem with spam we were experiencing at the time.  While that was 
> fairly successful so far (knock on wood), the overwhelming amount 
of 
> what remains are fairly basic RSS 2.0 questions.
> 
> The problem is that none of the RSS Advisory Board members are 
active 
> participants on this mailing list.
> 
> I'm looking for suggestions.  It seems to me that we either need to 
> bring Mohamed to the Mountain (i.e., encourage some of you to 
> participate), or we need to bring the Mountain to Mohamed (e.g., 
change 
> the template at the bottom of every FeedValidator help page to 
suggest 
> that RSS 2.0 specific questions are to go to this list, with the 
> remainder going to the Feed Validator Google Group).
> 
> You can get an idea of the volume and kind of questions here:
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/feedvalidator-users/
> 
> - Sam Ruby
>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/