Re: Plus-separated categories
"scamden" <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:17:20 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with Randy. '+' is perfectly legal within the text of a category element, and shouldn't receive any special interpretation. --- In [email protected], "Randy Morin" <randy@...> wrote: > > It would be incorrect to interpret this as two categories. It's > actually one category called "Music + Dreams". Two categories should be > two category elements. I'm not aware of any major publishers that are > making this mistake. James might know better. > MHO, > > Randy > http://www.therssweblog.com > > --- In [email protected], "Victor Porton" <porton@> wrote: > > > > Somewhere I've viewed an RSS (if I remember correctly RSS 2.0) file > > with single <category> tag but two categories separated with '+' sign. > > Something like this: > > > > <category>Music + Dreams</category> > > > > Should my RSS aggregator which I currently write consider this as two > > categories? What is this plus-separated format: standard, common > > practice, or just a little mis-behavior of marginal users? Is it > > necessary to take it into account? > > > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/