Re: Sam Ruby is a Vandal and a Lying Sack of Shit

I've tried to be rather respectful but since Sam Ruby insists on responding
disrespectfully as if I have shit for brains I might as well respond in kind
as he (you) have clearly become a lying sack of shit Sam Ruby. 

Stop with your double-talk and bullshit lies.
Stop being a vandal and spray painting the results of my software service
with graffiti.

Few if anybody is going to care about your fucked up help link which I would
be more than happy to stuff up your pompous ass you stinking rat bastard.

QUIT MARKING UP MY WORK AND DISPARAGING MY SOFTWARE SERVICES BY INFERENCE,
IMPLICATION AND INNUENDO WHEN THERE IS NOTHING INVALID IN THE XML OR I WILL
BE COMPELLED TO USE XML COMMENTS IN EACH OF THE FEEDS MY SOFTWARE GENERATES
TO DISCLAIM, WARN AND IDENTIFY YOU BY NAME AS A LYING MANIPULATIVE STINKING
POLITICAL RAT BASTARD YOU HAVE BECOME.

FUCK YOUR HELP LINK.
FUCK YOUR FEEDBACK LINK.
FUCK YOUR GRAFFITI.
FUCK YOUR IDEAS ABOUT ATOM.
AND FUCK YOU TOO.

LEAVE MY WORK ALONE AND STOP DISPARAGING MY SOFTWARE SERVICES AND DON'T
TOUCH MY WORK WITH YOUR XML VALIDATOR UNLESS THE XML IS **INVALID XML** KEEP
YOUR POLITICS TO YOURSELF OR I WILL SHOVE YOUR POLITICAL BULLSHIT SO FAR UP
YOUR ASS THE ONCE PRESUMED GOOD BUT NOW GOOD FOR SHIT NAME SAM RUBY WILL BE
EVERYWHERE ON THE WEB AND EVERY LISTSERVE AND BLOG I CAN FIND TO WARN
EVERYBODY THAT SAM RUBY HAS BECOME A VANDAL AND A LYING SACK OF POLITICAL
SHIT.

HOW DARE YOU TRY TO FUCK PEOPLE AROUND WITH YOUR POLITICS.

YOU GOT THE WRONG GUY THIS TIME. I'M NOT DAVE WINER.

STOP VANDALIZING MY WORK MARKING IT UP WITH YELLOW GRAFITTI DISPARAGING IT
BY INFERENCE, IMPLICATION AND INNUENDO. 
STOP VANDALIZING AND MARKING RSS FEEDS AS WARNINGS OR ERRORS IF THEY DO NOT
SUPPORT ATOM.
THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO CONVEY YOUR PREFERENCES THAN VANDALIZING AND
DISPARAGING THE WORKS OF OTHERS.

FINALLY THE MAIN POINT WHICH BELIES YOUR BULLSHIT: STOP PRESUMING WHAT
OTHERS WILL OR WILL NOT THINK, WILL OR WILL NOT DO, WHAT LINK OTHERS WILL OR
WILL NOT CLICK TO MAYBE OR INTENTIONALLY FOLLOW YOUR STUPID ASS FEEDBACK
LINK BECAUSE YOU CANNOT POSSIBLY KNOW OR CONTROL WHAT IS IN THE MIND OF
OTHERS, WHAT THEY KNOW OR DON'T KNOW ABOUT RSS OR ATOM AND XML VALIDATION
ITSELF. 


ONCE YOU HAVE PUT INTO SOMEBODY'S MIND THAT SOMETHING IS OR MAY BE WRONG BY
INFERRING, IMPLYING OR BY INNUENDO IT IS THE PERCEPTION OF MY SOFTWARE
SERVICE THAT CAN AND LIKELY WILL BE BLAMED YOU PRESUMPTUOS POMPOUS ASSHOLE.

YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD PLAIN AND SIMPLE. THIS IS THE LAST TIME I WILL EVEN TRY
TO EXPLAIN FURTHER YOU LYING SACK OF SHIT. I HAVE NO TIME AND NO INTEREST TO
PLAY YOUR WORD GAMES WITH YOUR DENIALS AND OBFUSCATION OF WHAT YOU HAVE DONE
TO MY WORK AND AS A MATTER OF COURSE TO THAT OF OTHERS IN THIS CONTEXT AND I
FOR ONE WILL NOT ALLOW IT TO CONTINUE.

CEASE AND DESIST YOU FUCKED UP VANDAL POLITICIAN PIECE OF SHIT OR THIS IS
GOING TO GET MUCH NASTIER AS YOU ARE AND WILL ALSO BE CONSIDERED LEGALLY
LIABLE FOR DAMAGES AS A VANDAL WHO HAS DISPARAGED AND ATTEMPTED TO DESTROY
MY SOFTWARE SERVICES THAT ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH YOUR TECHNO-POLITICS.

YOU WANT TO PLAY WORD GAMES AND BE A VANDAL? TRY ME.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [rss-public] Digest Number 327
> 
> There are 4 messages in this issue.
> 
> Topics in this digest:
> 
> 1a. feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy resource
>     From: Clinton Gallagher
> 1b. Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy
> resourc
>     From: Sam Ruby
> 1c. Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy
> resourc
>     From: rcade
> 1d. Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy
> resourc
>     From: James M Snell
> 
> 
> Messages
> _______________________________________________________________________
> _
> 1a. feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy resource
>     Posted by: "Clinton Gallagher"> 

     Date: Tue Sep 9, 2008 12:17 pm ((PDT))
> 
> I don't like the idea that this particular feed validator flags and
> calls
> our namespace "unknown" and marks it up --indicating-- an error and
> --implying-- something is wrong with it. If the code is well-formed
> leave it
> alone and quit playing elitist asshole politics unless you have a
> methodology to determine and test the XML namespace for VALIDITY not
> its
> POPULARITY NO DIFFERENT THAN ASSHOLE POLITICIANS DO TO CAST ASPERSIONS
> ON
> COMPETITION.
> 
> Secondly, marking up the results of one of the feeds my software
> generates
> as an error to notify and advise the use of an atom:link is also an
> underhanded way to recommend what you believe should be done regardless
> of
> the veracity of what you contend. Marking my work up as an error?
> 
> Why are you are spray painting yellow graffiti on my work?
> 
> //example
> http://metromilwaukee.com/feeds/rsstestnamespaces.xml
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Messages in this topic (4)
> _______________________________________________________________________
> _
> 1b. Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy
> resourc
>     Posted by: "Sam Ruby" [email protected] sa3ruby
>     Date: Tue Sep 9, 2008 12:42 pm ((PDT))
> 
> Clinton Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > I don't like the idea that this particular feed validator flags and
> calls
> > our namespace "unknown" and marks it up --indicating-- an error and
> > --implying-- something is wrong with it. If the code is well-formed
> leave it
> > alone and quit playing elitist asshole politics unless you have a
> > methodology to determine and test the XML namespace for VALIDITY not
> its
> > POPULARITY NO DIFFERENT THAN ASSHOLE POLITICIANS DO TO CAST
> ASPERSIONS ON
> > COMPETITION.
> 
> First, it does *not* mark the feed as an error.
> 
> Second, did you follow the provided [help] link?
> 
>    http://feedvalidator.org/docs/warning/UnknownNamespace.html
> 
> If you did, it tells you how to provide feedback on this issue, and
> what
> information would be helpful to provide.
> 
> > Secondly, marking up the results of one of the feeds my software
> generates
> > as an error to notify and advise the use of an atom:link is also an
> > underhanded way to recommend what you believe should be done
> regardless of
> > the veracity of what you contend. Marking my work up as an error?
> 
> Again, this is clearly not marked an error.
> 
> And again, did you follow the provided [help] link on that message
> either?  It provides a brief summary of why this message was provided,
> complete with links as to where you can find more information.  In the
> case of that particular message, this mailing list is the right place
> to
> inquire further on the topic.
> 
> > Why are you are spray painting yellow graffiti on my work?
> >
> > //example
> > http://metromilwaukee.com/feeds/rsstestnamespaces.xml
> > <http://metromilwaukee.com/feeds/rsstestnamespaces.xml>
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> 
> 
> Messages in this topic (4)
> _______________________________________________________________________
> _
> 1c. Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy
> resourc
>     Posted by: "rcade" [email protected] rcade
>     Date: Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:15 pm ((PDT))
> 
> As Sam said, the two issues are warnings, not errors.
> 
> I run into the "unknown namespace" warning on my own feeds, because I
> use a personal namespace in some blog software I've coded. I've never
> heard from a reader of my feeds who has a concern about the warning.
> 
> The atom:link warning is reflective of the decision to use the RSS
> Profile's recommendations in the Feed Validator. I think that's a good
> policy, because the profile and validator compliment each other.
> 
> In this case, you're well-versed in the issues involved with unknown
> namespaces, atom:link and RSS validation. So none of the warnings
> could have thrown you for a loop personally. Are you upset because
> users are complaining?
> 
> 
> 
> Messages in this topic (4)
> _______________________________________________________________________
> _
> 1d. Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy
> resourc
>     Posted by: "James M Snell" [email protected] jasnellspace
>     Date: Tue Sep 9, 2008 5:05 pm ((PDT))
> 
> I'm sorry, why exactly is it a problem for the validator to explicitly
> indicate that there is a part of the feed it is incapable of
> validating?
>   That's all the unknown namespace warning does.
> 
> - James
> 
> Clinton Gallagher wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don't like the idea that this particular feed validator flags and
> calls
> > our namespace "unknown" and marks it up --indicating-- an error and
> > --implying-- something is wrong with it. If the code is well-formed
> leave it
> > alone and quit playing elitist asshole politics unless you have a
> > methodology to determine and test the XML namespace for VALIDITY not
> its
> > POPULARITY NO DIFFERENT THAN ASSHOLE POLITICIANS DO TO CAST
> ASPERSIONS ON
> > COMPETITION.
> >
> > Secondly, marking up the results of one of the feeds my software
> generates
> > as an error to notify and advise the use of an atom:link is also an
> > underhanded way to recommend what you believe should be done
> regardless of
> > the veracity of what you contend. Marking my work up as an error?
> >
> > Why are you are spray painting yellow graffiti on my work?
> >
> > //example
> > http://metromilwaukee.com/feeds/rsstestnamespaces.xml
> > <http://metromilwaukee.com/feeds/rsstestnamespaces.xml>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Messages in this topic (4)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/