Re: Adapting RSS-0.91/RSS-0.9 to the new hosting at http://www.rssboard.org/

I agree that they are invalid and to include that change in the 
validator, but would rather suggest to the publisher an upgrade to 
RSS 2.0 than continued use of DTDs.
MHO,

Randy
http://www.therssweblog.com

--- In [email protected], Sam Ruby <rubys@...> wrote:
>
> This may initially sound overly harsh, but given that the 
definition of 
> XML Validity is based on checks against a DTD, and given that the 
> NetScape DTD can no longer be obtained at the prior address, I'm 
> inclined to have the feedvalidator flag any such uses as invalid.  
I've 
> made and deployed that change, but would be willing to downgrade 
the 
> message to a warning.
> 
> The first suggestion in the detailed message is to use the advisory 
> board's DTD.
> 
> In general, I would not recommend that anybody use DTDs, but I've 
made 
> sure that no such warning occurs for the advisory boards DTD.
> 
> If the advisory board's DTD is used, the entity definitions defined 
> therein are also accepted.
> 
> - Sam Ruby
>



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/