Re: RSS : a "namespace" in itself ?

Thanks James!

There is only 7 clients that support the userland namespace and 
wouldn't support a new namespace. I would go with a new namespace and 
a bold warning against using the namespace in RSS documents. In fact, 
I'm putting a warning on this thread, just in case.

   !!!WARNING!!!!
In no way should anybody interpret anything in this thread or any 
spec changes resulting from this thread as permission to use a 
namespace for RSS 2.0 elements in an RSS 2.0 document.
   !!!WARNING!!!!

Further, I wouldn't require the use of the namespace, but rather 
suggest the use of the namespace when and only when it helps embed 
RSS elements in other documents.

MHO,

Randy
http://www.therssweblog.com


--- In [email protected], "James Holderness" <j4_james@...> 
wrote:
> Results now up on my blog:
> http://www.xn--8ws00zhy3a.com/blog/2009/02/a-namespace-for-rss
> 




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/