Re: RSS : a "namespace" in itself ?

After some further research:  Visual Studio only generates a warning 
if the URI points to a file with extension .xsd that either cannot be 
opened or is not in a valid XSD format.

SlickEdit, on the other hand, generates a popup warning any time that 
the URI is not an XSD.

I fully understand that having the URI point to an XSD is optional, 
but I think that it is optimal.  I'm happy, though, if we just choose 
a URI that has no file extension.  We can point it at an HTML document 
for now, and then later if we decide to develop an XSD we can point it 
there instead.

--- In [email protected], Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@...> 
wrote:
>
> * scamden <sterling@...> [2009-02-12 22:40]:
> > Both Visual Studio and SlickEdit will verify XML grammar
> > against the XSD located at the URI, and both warn if that
> > URI does not lead to a schema that can be opened.
> >
> > As for an example of a URI that leads to an XSD, look no
> > further than the recommended URI for the SOAP envelope:
> > http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope
> 
> It doesn’t surprise me that SOAPy things show bias in their
> coverage of the data-vs-document spectrum of uses for XML.
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
>





------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/