Re: [Fwd: Re: [rss-media] Specification currently lists the wrong namespace]
Ryan Parman <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:53:37 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8F3326D0-A39C-43B1-AB17-694B56AD6A06__6769.75696483186$1249401273$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
Sapna, et al: Several months back, there was discussion about placing the=20=20 custodianship of the Media RSS spec with the RSS Advisory Board. The=20=20 folks at Yahoo! at the time had consented that it was a good idea (I=20=20 believe this was Jeremy Zawdony, IIRC), but there never seemed to be=20=20 any forward progress on that initiative. My concern stems from the fact that the Media RSS spec has been broken/=20 incorrect multiple times now under Yahoo!'s custodianship. This is a=20=20 spec that many people depend on, and speaking as the developer of the=20=20 SimplePie RSS parser, arbitrarily changing the namespace URL=20=20 substantially affects our ability to handle Media RSS feeds. (We=20=20 already have to normalize the two different Media RSS namespace URLs=20=20 that are floating around: one with, and one without the trailing slash=20=20 -- which was broken for over a year.) I would really like to see the RSS Advisory Board pass a resolution to=20=20 publish the namespace documentation on its site with the proper=20=20 longtime namespace URI. Netscape trusted the board to oversee RSS 0.90=20=20 and RSS 0.91, and I would hope that Yahoo! would be able to see that=20=20 this transfer of custodianship would be a Good Thing=99 for the Media=20=20 RSS community. Future changes to the spec could be handled by the Media RSS=20=20 community, of which Yahoo! and others could be a part. Thoughts? On Jul 28, 2009, at 12:52 AM, Sapna Chandiramani wrote: > Folks, > > I apologize for the issues on behalf of Yahoo. > There were indeed some problems with the spec. This happened when we=20=20 > were moving the spec to the Video Search servers so it would be=20=20 > easier to respond to issues and requests henceforth. > > In any case, we have reverted back the spec. We are also working on=20=20 > a newer version of the spec that addresses some concerns this group=20=20 > had pointed out earlier, as well as some enhancements that we felt=20=20 > would be good to have. > > We will send that out for review to you soon. > > Thanks, > Sapna > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [rss-media] Specification currently lists the wrong=20=20 > namespace > Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:17:48 +0530 > From: Joly MacFie <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > References: <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > > Earlier discussion: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/msearch?query=3Dslash&submit= =3DSearch&charset=3DISO-8859-1 > <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-media/msearch?query=3Dslash&submi= t=3DSearch&charset=3DISO-8859-1=20 > > > > Yahoo's neglect is a shame. Wasn't there some talk of moving it out of > their control? > > joly > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Ryan Parman > <[email protected]=20=20 > <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > It looks like Yahoo once again arbitrarily changed the spec without > telling anybody. > > As of the last update that anybody was aware of, we had: > > 03/12/2008 - Namespace corrections: [1.1.2] > > * Added trailing slash to namespace > > The correct namespace *should* be exactly what you posted. > Apparently, Yahoo thought it'd be a good idea to change the > namespace again and break all sorts of parsing software. It is > embarrassing how badly they've bungled this spec. > > Once upon a time it fell to Jeremy Zawdony, but he's left Yahoo > since then. From what I can tell, nobody at Yahoo is paying > attention to this spec. > > On Jul 20, 2009, at 8:20 AM, James Abley wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm putting http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/ > > <http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/> into my browser, which used to > > display the spec and have the correct namespace on the page. At > > the moment, I'm getting a 302 back to > > > > Location: http://video.search.yahoo.com/mrss > > <http://video.search.yahoo.com/mrss> > > > > and that URL is used as the namespace URI in the rendered > > specification. > > > > Anyone else noticed this and know who to raise it with? I don't > > want any more ambiguity in the world as to the correct namespace > > URI for this extension! > > > > Cheers, > > > > James > > > > --=20 > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Joly MacFie 917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast > WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com <http://wwwhatsup.com> > http://pinstand.com <http://pinstand.com> - http://punkcast.com > <http://punkcast.com> > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > >=20 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected]=20 mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/