Re: testing; and a few questions
Dirk Nimmich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.tin.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] schrieb: [fixed article screen header] > I do see some of the potential advantages, but I still think it's > a net loss The main problem with your suggestion is that if you use line scrolling, the article would jump up and down if you scroll down or up only one line immediately after (or before) the first screen. You will lose the line you were reading just before. The other problem is that it is a major pain to implement; the new code is much easier to understand and maintain because you don't have to distinguish between "we are on the first line" and "we are on any other line". In addition, we don't have to redraw the full screen but only the article "pane". That's also a UI issue because the screen flickers on a full redraw. If there will be any changes to the article screen header it will be likely a configurable format variable. But still, it is very likely that there will be no distinction between being on the first or any other line. It will just be fixed as it is now (but configurable in what it will display in how many lines.) When this is done, you may configure this screen header to only display one and your hyphenation line and use the news_headers_to_(not_)display tinrc setting for the first screen.