RE: RANCID filter_audit

>   Gentlemen,
>=20
>      If this is going to be an ongoing discussion lets point it to
> [email protected] instead of this mailbox.

isn't this mailbox for these discussions ? ([email protected])
=20
>      If making heads/tails of IOS is the issue please tell me=20
> I'm not the only
> survivor of a compiler construction class who is reading this=20
> ... there must be
> a public body of work already done for this and it would=20
> appear that Cisco uses
> it internally:
>=20
>=20
> http://scottstuff.net/blog/articles/tag/cisco
>=20
>=20
>                         Neal
>=20

yes, I did survive a compiler construction class recently, but I don't
think we really want to program at such high level. we only want simple
tool to do config parsing.