Re: trn4, clang, static analysis

On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Ollivier Robert wrote:
>Is there any interest in what I intend to do?

I'm interested just for curiousity's sake.  (I don't have a newsfeed
anymore... I should try one of the free ones..)

>PS: 68 identified "problems" in the first run.

I think your quotes imply this, but there ARE false positives that it 
finds, too.  It has found a lot of good problems, IMHO.
(False problems should be written up as bugs against the checker.)

I've thought of running the checker against other open source things
I use, like alpine.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com