Re: installing tux
"Sam Watkins" <[email protected]> Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:07:50 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.tux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:04 +0300, "Kursad Keskinege" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sam, personally, I would suggest nginx for litespeed replacement, > www.nginx.net, it's quite well under heavy load, incredible session > numbers it can support, also built in http load balancing. (what a > pity that it cannot support https load balancing natively) > K. > ps. i am not against tux. i loved the idea, but it's not stable Thanks, I'm aware of nginx and I have been benchmarking nginx 7, litespeed, cherokee, apache2 and the web server I am writing which I am calling tachyon. I am writing my own web server with specific features not found on other web servers, so I'm not interested in actually using another web server, I only want to benchmark them. My webserver outperforms all of the other web servers I have benchmarked. I also want to test it against tux, that's why I want to know the best way to install tux. Is tux still included in fedora distributions? thanks, Sam