Re: tux performance on Linux 2.4.17
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.tux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Yaoping Ruan wrote: > Greeting: > Recently I did a simple test trying to compare the performance of TUX > and Zues, Flash, as well as Apache1.3.20. For each test run, all clients > request for a same file. And run this test from small files to large > files. > Very surprising, though the throughputs of small files of TUX do exceed > other servers, for files with size larger than 4K, TUX's number is > almost as low as Apache's. > If I am not wrong, TUX's copy free is set by default. Thus one would > expect to see more benefit for large files. So I am wondering if there's > any configuration tips I missed. > > Any idea? Thanks in advance > > - Randy strange. I've tried streaming pretty large files: 3-7GB with tux and I find it excellent up to ~50 concurrent connections -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.