Re: Strange tux problem

Hans Christian Saustrup <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.tux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:39:03AM -0400, Mark Swanson wrote:

>> Confirmed - if I create an empty directory foo.domain.com, tux will give
>> up and forward the request to Apache, instead of just closing the
>> connection. Since the usual response from tux when it's confused is
>> something like "page not found", I suspect closing the connection
>> without any response is a bug? :-)

> I agree, and I'm relying on the current behavior. Some clients refuse to send 
> the fqdn and use the IP address in the URL. Tux doesn't understand that the 
> IP address corresponds to www.foo.com. One way to make this work is to create 
> an empty directory with the IP address as the directory name. Tux then 
> forwards the request on to Apache. (One such client is from 
> themindelectric.com (GLUE)). I've asked them to consider sending the fqdn but 
> they will not so tux needs to support this behavior.

So if tux *didn't* rely on the existence of the host/ip directory, and just
forwarded the request to ie. Apache whenever it couldn't handle it
by itself, that would work for you too.. and you wouldn't have to
create empty directories :-)

Anyone up for a bughunt? :-)

Cheers, HC

-- 
Hans Christian Saustrup
Chief of Research/Development
Digital Team ApS - a division of Media-I
Banegaardspladsen 6, 1TH / DK-8000 Aarhus C / Denmark

Value your privacy - use PGP/GPGuard.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.