Re: load balancing
Javier Gostling <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.tux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:09:04PM +0200, Herald van der Breggen wrote: > Javier Gostling wrote: > > It seems to me that the best solution would be to have every machine > > run tux as well as apache (or another back-end web server), and do > > simple network load balancing with either a Layer 4 switch or a LVS. > > Thanks for your suggestion! > > Yes, I thought of that and that is of course possible. > > The thing is we have about 250Gb static content. Not something that I > would like to copy to every server. And keep in sync. Maybe NFS can help > us out, though nfs can slow tux down..... Maybe keeping the content sync'd with rsync would help. Slow for initial setup, but fast afterwards. Another possibility would be to try a shared storage device (shared SCSI or Fiber Channel) with a shared filesystem on top (like Sistina's GFS). Cheers, -- Javier Gostling Ingeniero de Sistemas Virtualia S.A. [email protected] Fono: +56 (2) 202-6264 x 130 Fax: +56 (2) 342-8763 Av. Kennedy 5757, of 1502 Las Condes Santiago Chile
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9kiCLVjet1TIOL3YRAmllAJ9lCTgJgABId3+6Ei9+iFHC9LhxiwCgr2YJ Fdjuii0Q/0+bCnn2mtsm5ks= =eTR+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----