Re: random system crashes

William R Thomas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.tux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Not trying to defend thttpd's honor nor to bash on TUX, but I would
gladly switch back to TUX if I thought whatever bug I ran into
repeatedly was fixed.  Even if I didn't see something in the changelog
for a newer version, I would instantly try to switch back to TUX
because I was so impressed with it both conceptually and performance
wise.  Well so impressed with it until I had to power cycle the box
every other day until I switched back to thttpd.  

And we were utilizing TUX in a pretty straight forward situation.  I
wasn't trying to serve files over NFS or anything strange.  

On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:00:31PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote:
> Kernel development is a tough thing (i know, i wrote some features for tux),
> so if only one person develops it, it is endeed a problem. from what you
> say, if thttpd is satisfying for you, then you probably do not need tux. but
> believe it or not, i have tried thttpd on my servers, and it just doesn't
> cut it after a certain load, so tux was a savier for me.
> 
> and tux works well, unless you do something it wasn't designed for (like
> serving over nfs or something like this).
> 
> From: "William R Thomas" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:29 PM
> Subject: Re: random system crashes
> 
> 
> > What filesystem are you running?  Myself and at least one other person
> > have had problems that sound very similar to this, and the only
> > unifying thing that we could come up with was using reiserfs.  I have
> > no knowledge if anyone has a stable TUX setup running on reiserfs, so
> > the filesystem thing is just a guess.
> >
> > Eventually after not being able to get more stability out of a new
> > server than a windows 95 box, we turned off TUX, turned back on
> > THTTPD, and strangely no longer crash our server every other day.
> >
> > I have never gotten a response from the list with any assistance, and
> > it seems like the general attitude on here is, "Why don't you write a
> > patch and maybe it will get added in."  The primary developer hasn't
> > said anything on the list that I have noticed in many months.  No
> > redhat employee I have seen has said anything on the list since he
> > last spoke up.  There were rumors to the affect that the development
> > effort is being placed into newer kernel strains, god forbid someone
> > would want to run a server off a stable kernel.
> >
> > As you can tell, I am a bit jaded over my experiences with Tux.  On
> > the surface it seemed awesome.  In practice it was like a formula one
> > car hitting a wall, i.e. damn did it go fast and in a blaze of glory.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Marco Rothley wrote:
> > > Hello all!
> > >
> > > I have a big problem with one of my webservers which is running TUX. I
> don't
> > > know if TUX is the reason for that but the system crashes from time to
> time
> > > and there is nothing special with it except the TUX.
> > > The crashes are a little uncommon: The system reacts on nothing but
> ping. Even
> > > the local console isn't responding but the ping-timing is low as under
> usual
> > > operation. There is nothing in the logfiles that points to a problem.
> They
> > > just stop and the next messages I see are the bootup messages of the
> kernel
> > > (after reboot). One time I just had top running on the machine as it
> crashed
> > > and I saw nothing special: Enough free memory, no high load and over 50%
> idle
> > > time on the two CPUs, etc.. And from one moment to the other it was
> frozen.
> > > I just thought someone could have similar problems and have a solution.
> The
> > > hardware was completely replaced by the hoster but the problem persists.
> Just
> > > the HD stayed the same but the RAID-Controller reported no failures. So
> I
> > > think it's not a hardware problem.
> > >
> > > The system is a dual P3 with 1.266 GHz, 1GB ECC-SDRAM from IBM (x330)
> with a
> > > SCSI RAID-Controller and 2x36GB IBM SCSI disks.
> > >
> > > The kernel Version is 2.4.18 with TUX 2.2.7. I don't know if there's any
> other
> > > patch in the kernel. I have Apache as "backend" server.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance!
> > >
> > > Marco.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > tux-list mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tux-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list
> >
> > .
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tux-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list

-- 
        William R. Thomas
        Corvar                               [email protected]
        Co-Webmaster                         http://www.theonering.net/
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
Every now and then when your life gets complicated and the weasels
start closing in, the only cure is to load up on heinous chemicals and
then drive like a bastard from Hollywood to Las Vegas ... with the
music at top volume and at least a pint of ether.
                -- H.S. Thompson, "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas"
X-Stamper-To: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.