Re: random system crashes
William R Thomas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.tux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Not trying to defend thttpd's honor nor to bash on TUX, but I would gladly switch back to TUX if I thought whatever bug I ran into repeatedly was fixed. Even if I didn't see something in the changelog for a newer version, I would instantly try to switch back to TUX because I was so impressed with it both conceptually and performance wise. Well so impressed with it until I had to power cycle the box every other day until I switched back to thttpd. And we were utilizing TUX in a pretty straight forward situation. I wasn't trying to serve files over NFS or anything strange. On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:00:31PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote: > Kernel development is a tough thing (i know, i wrote some features for tux), > so if only one person develops it, it is endeed a problem. from what you > say, if thttpd is satisfying for you, then you probably do not need tux. but > believe it or not, i have tried thttpd on my servers, and it just doesn't > cut it after a certain load, so tux was a savier for me. > > and tux works well, unless you do something it wasn't designed for (like > serving over nfs or something like this). > > From: "William R Thomas" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:29 PM > Subject: Re: random system crashes > > > > What filesystem are you running? Myself and at least one other person > > have had problems that sound very similar to this, and the only > > unifying thing that we could come up with was using reiserfs. I have > > no knowledge if anyone has a stable TUX setup running on reiserfs, so > > the filesystem thing is just a guess. > > > > Eventually after not being able to get more stability out of a new > > server than a windows 95 box, we turned off TUX, turned back on > > THTTPD, and strangely no longer crash our server every other day. > > > > I have never gotten a response from the list with any assistance, and > > it seems like the general attitude on here is, "Why don't you write a > > patch and maybe it will get added in." The primary developer hasn't > > said anything on the list that I have noticed in many months. No > > redhat employee I have seen has said anything on the list since he > > last spoke up. There were rumors to the affect that the development > > effort is being placed into newer kernel strains, god forbid someone > > would want to run a server off a stable kernel. > > > > As you can tell, I am a bit jaded over my experiences with Tux. On > > the surface it seemed awesome. In practice it was like a formula one > > car hitting a wall, i.e. damn did it go fast and in a blaze of glory. > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Marco Rothley wrote: > > > Hello all! > > > > > > I have a big problem with one of my webservers which is running TUX. I > don't > > > know if TUX is the reason for that but the system crashes from time to > time > > > and there is nothing special with it except the TUX. > > > The crashes are a little uncommon: The system reacts on nothing but > ping. Even > > > the local console isn't responding but the ping-timing is low as under > usual > > > operation. There is nothing in the logfiles that points to a problem. > They > > > just stop and the next messages I see are the bootup messages of the > kernel > > > (after reboot). One time I just had top running on the machine as it > crashed > > > and I saw nothing special: Enough free memory, no high load and over 50% > idle > > > time on the two CPUs, etc.. And from one moment to the other it was > frozen. > > > I just thought someone could have similar problems and have a solution. > The > > > hardware was completely replaced by the hoster but the problem persists. > Just > > > the HD stayed the same but the RAID-Controller reported no failures. So > I > > > think it's not a hardware problem. > > > > > > The system is a dual P3 with 1.266 GHz, 1GB ECC-SDRAM from IBM (x330) > with a > > > SCSI RAID-Controller and 2x36GB IBM SCSI disks. > > > > > > The kernel Version is 2.4.18 with TUX 2.2.7. I don't know if there's any > other > > > patch in the kernel. I have Apache as "backend" server. > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > Marco. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > tux-list mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tux-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list > > > > . > > > > _______________________________________________ > tux-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list -- William R. Thomas Corvar [email protected] Co-Webmaster http://www.theonering.net/ *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* Every now and then when your life gets complicated and the weasels start closing in, the only cure is to load up on heinous chemicals and then drive like a bastard from Hollywood to Las Vegas ... with the music at top volume and at least a pint of ether. -- H.S. Thompson, "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" X-Stamper-To: [email protected]