Re: Tux Web Server
Matthew Hodgson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.tux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 15 Oct 2002, Safedin Kajoshaj wrote: > On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 18:47, Alex Kramarov wrote: > > If it works for you, then use it. the problems that ppl describing, either > > they appear from the start, or not at all. > > Thanks, just another question thu. I keep reading about how apache can > be used to do the things that tux can't, and Tux being able to 'hand > things off' to apache. I am only interesting in serving my page, a > static html/image site. I only have tux installed. Should I install > apache, or am I right in thinking it's not necessary, as Tux by itself > seems to be handle things? TUX (assuming that it doesn't kill the machine every few days) is absolutely perfect for running on its own without the need for Apache (or any other bloated server) running in the background for this kind of purpose. And to echo what Alex says above, if the setup is stable for around 14 days or so, I'd suspect that it'll remain stable for the forseeable future. My first hang was within 6 hours of setting TUX live - and then there was a gap of 6 days (or so) - after which it averaged out at around 3-5 days of uptime between freezes. M.