RE: Problems running Tux w/ 2.4.19 generic

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.network.tux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the help,

This did in fact stop the hunks from failing when patching the generic 2.4.19 kernel.  However, I am still seeing Tux drop threads for no reason that I can see.

Has anyone had a problem with Tux dropping threads, and such, no longer responding to requests?



-----Original Message-----
From: Shane Allen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Problems running Tux w/ 2.4.19 generic


On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:49:54AM -0600, [email protected] wrote:
> Thank you for responding,
> 
> I am unaware of any patch that has been ported to 2.4.19.  Is there a ported patch available somewhere?

I thought someone had made one...

> Yes I had several hunks fail, but as this is not my area of expertise, I am unable to create a work around.

Then that is likely the source of your problem...

> Only Logging, and redirect_logging are enabled, from reading past archive messages I had thought that referer_logging was causing the errors.  Should I disable all logging?

I wouldn't worry about it at this point, hunks failing is in my best
guess the source of the problem. Check the archives for the link to my
patch against 2.4.21-pre2. Download and unpack it, and change the following:
-at line 1674, delete the three lines reading:
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies);
and add three lines reading:
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sys_sched_yield);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xtime);

Then run the modified patch against vanilla 2.4.19. It should patch
without any hunks failing.

The previous suggestion of 2.4.19-aa may work, I have not tried it
myself, and do not run SuSE, so I cannot say.

-- 
Shane Allen <[email protected]>



_______________________________________________
tux-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.