Re: Tux Patch for Linux-2.4.21-rc1
Matthew Hodgson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.tux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Simon Brock wrote: > Regards, > Simon. > > PS Just for the record, we are running TUX from the RH8.0 and are > logging traffic via tux. What is the problem with logging? Several people (myself included) had an issue where TUX would completely hang a server after a few (1-10) days, yielding it unresponsive other than to ping. Finding any common factor between people experiencing the problem was dubious - in the end the only thing that could be obviously seen in common was the fact that all the sufferers appeared to have logging enabled. For my purposes, despite serving a fairly steady 50-70 hits/s off TUX, logging is essential for checking referrers and popularity of parts of sites - and thus turning it off wasn't really an option. The whole subject was covered pretty comprehensively in the thread "random system crashes", which can be browsed at MARC at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tux-list&m=103460993003287&w=2 as various people on the list compared & contrasted their setups (operational and otherwise) to try to diagnose the problem. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tux-list&m=103472615516863&w=2 was my chain of thought from wrestling with TUX back in May of last year, fwiw. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tux-list&m=102260919428123&w=2 is a report of the problem also from May, back when people thought it might be an issue with manipulating log files whilst TUX was writing to them. If anyone ever found a solution i'd be very interested - thttpd is getting a bit long in the tooth; and there was real elegance in the way TUX passed things through to the actual webserver. cheers, M. _______________________________________ Matthew Hodgson [email protected]