Re: Tux serving graphics only

My experience with tux is that it works way cool with
Apache.  Serves static files faster in particular
image files significantly faster than Apache, in my
experience so far.  Nice for my web server that
resides on a dsl line.  I have been quite happy with
tux so far.  Very simple once you get the hang of it.

> 
> I'm still learning about tux and how it works. 
> Haven't implemented it yet on a production box.  But
> here's a question: Since I'm using Linux/Apache and
> Apache performs better when it doesn't have to
> handle serving graphics, would it be wise to use tux
> to serve the graphics?  I was hoping that if Apache
> still did all the .html file requests, I wouldn't
> have to change any log file program configurations. 
> Tux could carry the load with the graphics and the
> overall system would respond better.
> 
> Anyone have any thoughts on this?  Anything would be
> appreciated.  Thanks for the help.
> 
> Peppi Vecchio | Web Developer 
> TECHNOLOGY SERVICES GROUP 
> ORANGE LAKE RESORT AND COUNTRY CLUB
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tux-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tux-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com