Re: Running programs in parallel
"darvon4u" <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:54:31 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ubh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
from what i could see, ubhdb can not be run in parallel with ubh because it marks all the "processing" articles as "unread" (which is bad for obvious reasons). i've had to comment that out. not sure about ubhasm, but i *think* it'll be fine since ubh deals with a set of articles it queries at the beginning, therefore adding more to the assemblies will only impact it on the next run (unless there's some sort of cleanup going on in ubhasm, which i'll have to check). sorry for ambiguous answers, but i'm still not completely awake. check it out, ubhdb and ubhasm are actually very easy to map out... ubh is relatively simple as well (if you do your own decoder, such as "yydecode" which for me personally proved to be much more reliable and useful than "uudecode" recommended earlier in this group). anyway, e-mail me if you have any further questions Andrey P.S. i've rewritten some things to use binded variables, and it speeds things up tremendously.. just an idea --- In [email protected], "lorphos" <sven@p...> wrote: > Hello, > > I read in the quickstart guide ( > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ubh/message/475 ) that it's possible to > run multiple instances of the ubh script. Is it also OK to run ubhasm > while ubhdb is still downloading headers? What other combinations are > permitted? > > Thanks, > -Sven ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Looking for the latest Free IT White Papers? Visit SearchSecurity.com to access over 500 white papers. Get instant access at SearchSecurity.com Today http://us.click.yahoo.com/_9UKOC/QLNGAA/fzPGAA/IHFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/