Re: The results of your email commands
"Benjamin C. Pierce" <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:02:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.unison.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
~/pub/unison/download/releases/stable> shasum -a 256 unison-2.48.3.tar.gz f40d3cfbe82078d79328b51acab3e5179f844135260c2f4710525b9b45b15483 unison-2.48.3.tar.gz > On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Matt McClure <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you! The Homebrew maintainers requested the SHA256 instead. Mind computing that also to confirm what I see myself? > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Benjamin C. Pierce <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Confirmed. And here’s the answer to your query. :-) > > ~/pub/unison/download/releases/stable> openssl sha1 unison-2.48.3.tar.gz > SHA1(unison-2.48.3.tar.gz)= 2a0cfc95e95b9e9457c39faa4fe5b8184023cd0c > > >> On Jun 14, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Matt McClure <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Please confirm my subscription. I'd like to post the following question to the list: >> >> What is the expected SHA1 hash of the file at http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison//download/releases/stable/unison-2.48.3.tar.gz <http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison//download/releases/stable/unison-2.48.3.tar.gz> ? >> >> The Homebrew community would like to confirm so that it can update its packaging configuration. >> >> Refer to https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/issues/35795 <https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/issues/35795> >> -- >> http://matthewlmcclure.com/ <http://matthewlmcclure.com/> >> http://cens.io/ <http://cens.io/> > > -- > http://matthewlmcclure.com <http://matthewlmcclure.com/> _______________________________________________ Unison-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers