Re: On making times=true the default
Tõivo Leedjärv <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Jan 2025 11:20:17 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.unison.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAALvpZQON2MHtrupdvYDpCeJi9LsD_zmQTfbKLPX2ATBESOG0w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 14:42, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > > My view is that FAT is a special case, and that FAT has time problems in > general. It would make sense for people using them to set times off, > maybe, and perhaps that could be part of "-fat". But I don't want to > mess up people that mitigate FAT's time bugs by setting their machines > to UTC. I also don't really want to add kludges for it, at least not > kludges that would affect anybody not asking for FAT kludges. After some research, I've found out that exFAT supports timestamps with 10 ms granularity and time zone offset information. I don't know how many implementations actually make use of that new capability or how commonly exFAT is used over legacy FAT.