Re: Can the documentation for Unison be migrated from the UPenn site?
Greg Troxel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.unison.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> writes: >> Also, there appears to be no css file to render the html version with the >> similar look as the previous html documentation, but that's minor (and >> perhaps intentional). > > My take is that unison being on github is a bug not a feature and my > energy, if any, would go to finding a place to migrate to. Yes, lots of > things about github are awkward. Plus they train proprietary AI on GPL > code -- which in my view is not ok. I don't think the lack of css is intentional. I think it's just that there is no .css in the sources. Adding a css file (being careful about licensing) seems fine, and I'm open to a PR that does that. I would like to stick with sources in the repo, and I don't really want to add build deps like a css generator; I don't know if the old css is hand written, or something else. That won't fix the github html rendering issues, but it's progress and lets the html in a package be rendered better. -- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].