Re: Database Selection...
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.up2date.current.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1013467093.8876.46.camel@jade> |
All patches gratefully accepted. On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 17:07, Matt Bottrell wrote: > Just a general request... > > Would it be better to have a database abraction layer so that the user can > choose the backend system... > > ie: Let the user make the choice of Oracle, Ingres, Informix, Sybase, > PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc. > > In theory this means some 'glue' for specific databases needs to be written, > but ensures the 'core' remains the same. > > It also ensures that an administrator doesn't have to justify 'another' > database, esp. when most orgs have already chosen a preferred database solution. > > Regards, > > Matt Bottrell > > PS: Been too busy to look at getting current up and running last week... will > look again later this week... > > > > _______________________________________________ > Current-server mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/current-server > > -- Hunter Matthews Unix / Network Administrator Office: BioScience 145/244 Duke Univ. Biology Department Key: F0F88438 / FFB5 34C0 B350 99A4 BB02 9779 A5DB 8B09 F0F8 8438 Never take candy from strangers. Especially on the internet.