Re: Re:Re: trying to use

Hunter Matthews <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.up2date.current.devel
Message-ID <1007753690.2432.49.camel@jade>
There is a new snapshot on the ftp server. I didn't update the web page
or send a freshmeat for this one - I'm going to try and work really hard
this weekend, and send out a 2.7 compatible snapshot on monday.

There are a number of minor (but crucial) bug fixes in this release:
1) naming error in sendClientResult() that would prevent sending any
files - the patch is to rename "tmp" to "tmpfile"

2) naming error in solvedeps() that would bomb any solvedeps call.
- patch is to rename chan_label to channels

3) There is a basic working Makefile now. make snapshot has always
worked - its how all the snapshots to date have been made. make archive
also - its how I did the 0.8.0 release.

Now there is a make install, which seems to do the right thing. It
includes provision for an install_root or BUILDROOT option for spec file
writing.

4) More updates for the 2.7 client handling - this code still doesn't
work yet, but should give an idea where we are going.



On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 12:07, [email protected] wrote:
> >The documentation may not be explicitly clear,
> but only 2.5 versions of 
> >up2date are supported at all. (2.5.4 was the
> last 2.5 released, and is
> >recommended)
> >
> The docs are clear, my message not.
> I have manually updated up2date to version 2.5.4
> because it does not work 2.7 and I got this
> dependency errors using 2.5.4 trying to update
> the machine.
> 
> >So 2.3 (which is what I think you are playing
> with) has a number of
> >differences from the 2.4 protocol, which is
> different still from the 2.5
> >protocol (2.5.4 is the fourth bug fix/minor
> feature update of the 2.5
> >client)
> 
> No I have manualy updated to 2.5.4 
> 
> >At present, I have no plans at all to support
> clients earlier than 2.5.
> >Since Red Hat release 2.7 clients backported to
> 6.2/7.0/7.1 releases of 
> >Red Hat, the question is whether to continue
> supporting 2.5 clients once
> >I have 2.7 support completed. I hope to
> complete that this weekend.
> >
> >Comments from users/ people planning on using
> current?
> 
> I think  there is no problem to support only new
> versions, but the question is when using the
> 2.5.4 (the supported version it can't resolve
> the dependencies to update the machine which I
> never updated before, the only rpms updated are
> the rhn_register and up2date-* python-* to make
> possible to use current)
> It get the list of packages, but get the error
> when trying to solve dependencies
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 09:32, [email protected]
> wrote:
> >> I tring to use it now.
> >> I got an machine without any pdates (RH 7.0)
> >> 
> >> I have manually updated rhn_register (version
> >> that comes does not have the config file and
> use
> >> default RH server)
> >> 
> >> changed configs, rhn_register works.
> >> 
> >> I have mannualy updated up2date because the
> >> version that comes with 7.0 try to use a
> listall
> >> command that current does not support.
> >> 
> >> The it connected fine, get the list of
> packages,
> >> but it can sove dependencies :
> >> 
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------
> >> function = solvedep
> >> Dispatching: up2date.solvedep
> >> ./up2date.py:solvedep({'unknowns':
> >> ['liblber.so.1', 'libldap.so.1',
> 'liblber.so.1',
> >> 'libldap.so.1', 'l
> >> iblber.so.1', 'libldap.so.1', 'liblber.so.1',
> >> 'libldap.so.1', 'liblber.so.1',
> 'libldap.so.1',
> >> 'libcryp
> >> to.so.1', 'libssl.so.1', 'libcrypto.so.1',
> >> 'libssl.so.1', 'libcrypto.so.1',
> 'libssl.so.1',
> >> 'liblber.so
> >> .1', 'libldap.so.1', 'liblber.so.1',
> >> 'libldap.so.1', 'liblber.so.1',
> 'libldap.so.1',
> >> 'liblber.so.1', '
> >> libldap.so.1']})
> >>
> ./packagedb.py:getCompatibleChannels({'client_arch':
> >> 'i686', 'client_release': '7.0'})
> >> ./packagedb.py:_getCannonArch({'arch':
> 'i686'})
> >> ERROR: Recognized function up2date.solvedep
> blew
> >> up with undefined error
> >>   exception said: chan_label
> >>   params were: ('<?xml
> >>
> version="1.0"?>\012<params>\012<param>\012<value><struct>\012<member>\012<name>
> >>
> type</name>\012<value><string>REAL</string></value>\012</member>\012<member>\012<name>architecture</na
> >>
> me>\012<value><string>i686</string></value>\012</member>\012<member>\012<name>checksum</name>\012<valu
> >>
> e><string>91b2f4199d9fd3e9ba0fd4d4b6348003f4d48a07</string></value>\012</member>\012<member>\012<name>
> >>
> os_release</name>\012<value><string>7.0</string></value>\012</member>\012<member>\012<name>description
> >> </name>\012<value><string>7.0 running on
> >>
> i686</string></value>\012</member>\012<member>\012<name>syste
> >>
> m_id</name>\012<value><string>Current-ANONYMOUS</string></value>\012</member>\012<member>\012<name>ope
> >> rating_system</name>\012<value><string>Red
> Hat
> >>
> Linux</string></value>\012</member>\012<member>\012<nam
> >>
> e>profile_name</name>\012<value><string>wando.intranet.saisp.br</string></value>\012</member>\012<memb
> >>
> er>\012<name>fields</name>\012<value><array><data>\012<value><string>type</string></value>\012<value><
> >>
> string>operating_system</string></value>\012<value><string>checksum</string></value>\012<value><string
> >>
> >description</string></value>\012<value><string>os_release</string></value>\012<value><string>architec
> >>
> ture</string></value>\012<value><string>system_id</string></value>\012<value><string>profile_name</str
> >>
> ing></value>\012<value><string>username</string></value>\012</data></array></value>\012</member>\012<m
> >>
> ember>\012<name>username</name>\012<value><string>amorim</string></value>\012</member>\012</struct></v
> >> alue>\012</param>\012</params>\012',
> >>  ['liblber.so.1',
> >>   'libldap.so.1',
> >>   'liblber.so.1',
> >>   'libldap.so.1',
> >>   'liblber.so.1',
> >>   'libldap.so.1',
> >>   'liblber.so.1',
> >>   'libldap.so.1',
> >>   'liblber.so.1',
> >>   'libldap.so.1',
> >>   'libcrypto.so.1',
> >>   'libssl.so.1',
> >>   'libcrypto.so.1',
> >>   'libssl.so.1',
> >>   'libcrypto.so.1',
> >>   'libssl.so.1',
> >>   'liblber.so.1',
> >>   'libldap.so.1',
> >>   'liblber.so.1',
> >>   'libldap.so.1',
> >>   'liblber.so.1',
> >>   'libldap.so.1',
> >>   'liblber.so.1',
> >>   'libldap.so.1'])
> >> END OF POST
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Mensagem Enviada pelo WebMail Ecodigit
> >> http://www.ecodigit.com.br
> >-- 
> >Hunter Matthews                          Unix /
> Network Administrator
> >Office: BioScience 145/244               Duke
> Univ. Biology Department
> >Key: F0F88438 / FFB5 34C0 B350 99A4 BB02  9779
> A5DB 8B09 F0F8 8438
> >Never take candy from strangers. Especially on
> the internet.
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Current-server mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/current-server
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Mensagem Enviada pelo WebMail Ecodigit
> http://www.ecodigit.com.br
-- 
Hunter Matthews                          Unix / Network Administrator
Office: BioScience 145/244               Duke Univ. Biology Department
Key: F0F88438 / FFB5 34C0 B350 99A4 BB02  9779 A5DB 8B09 F0F8 8438
Never take candy from strangers. Especially on the internet.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.