Out of curiosity, I tried to reach www.nrh-up2date.com, but it seems the
server is down. Is this temporary or permanent?
Gustav
|--------+----------------------------------------->
| | "Alex Kramarov" |
| | <[email protected]> |
| | Sent by: |
| | [email protected]|
| | g.duke.edu |
| | |
| | |
| | 09-08-02 06:03 PM |
| | Please respond to |
| | current-server |
| | |
|--------+----------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: <[email protected]> |
| cc: (bcc: Gustav Schaffter/CDS/CG/CAPITAL) |
| Subject: [Current-server] another approach to what current does |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hello.
Recently i had some free time, and a farm of 9 linux systems on a
production
site, which i was sick to update the regular way from RHN. I have tried
some
other soulutions like yum, but they didn't seem solid enough for me, so i
said to myself - let's take a look at what up2date does and how it talks to
the server - all i need is one server downloading the updates into my
internal network, and others pulling it from him. At the time i wasn't able
to locate your project (there are only 92 reverse links on google from your
site, surprising). As we all now, all downloaded stuff is at
/var/spool/up2date , so all i needed to solve the authentication phase of
up2date - that was done by 10-line perl script. I have documented my work,
and posted it at www.nrh-up2date.com. (Yes, that's Not RedHat's up2date :)
.
today your project was brought to my attention, and i took a look at it .
seems much more advanced then what i did, but also with more requirements -
my goal was to make a minimal system (apache + perl + working up2date
client) to become a proxy betrween the up2date content and the up2date
clients on other computers - your's seems to have a database attached to
it,
and some more advanced configuration required .
I would apriciate if someone from the developers of current took the 15
minutes to read through my documentation, give some comments, and state if
we could work together . I understand, that i have a much different
approach
from you (my server does not require registration, doesn't need database,
works with files only, and relies on content from RHN servers) , but i hope
that we can work together and provide 2 different groups of people with 2
different needs - these who need the advanced tracking (system by system)
functionality you plan to offer will use the Current server, and these that
need only a proxy can use my code . RedHat also has 2 products they sell
that correspond to the proxy idea i implemented, and the enterprise server
(Currnet) which duplicates redhat's RHN functionality for large
depatrments.
As i can understand, your solution can have a performance limiting factor,
while mine is based on the apache + 10line perl script - there are no
performance bottlecks.
Regards,
Alex.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.