Re: [Fwd: Code Tarball]
Todd Nemanich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.up2date.current.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hunter Matthews wrote: > Toby was nice enough to say I could forward this to the list - there's > been a lot of talk lately about an sql backend for Current. This looks > like a starting point. > This is good stuff. It is a good start to the code to feed the database. > Todd - is this design compatible/comparable with what you were talking > about? > Somewhat. It's not really normalized, and it's rather simplified. This really only has two entities and some relations between the two and each other. I can work with this though. Toby, I'm going to post the new schema I have (E-R form) in a little bit here. I'd like to hear your thoughts specifically on the channel priority and dependency preferrence. Also, I would like to know what this arch_cannon field is. > -----Forwarded Message----- > > >>From: Toby D. Reeves <[email protected]> >>To: Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> >>Subject: Code Tarball >>Date: 31 Jan 2002 14:56:48 -0500 >> >>Hello, >> >>Attached is a tarball for your amusement. >> >>It has several README files in it. >>It is not finished. (Is anything ever finished?) >>It does not work yet either. But it probably could shortly. >>But it is to a point where someone can look it over. >> >>It is meant to be untar'ed under the current directory. >> >>What do you think? I'll ditch it and get back to my real job if >>you are not REALLY interested. Or, might be a starting point for >>someone else in the "/future". >> >>Toby >> >> >> current-tdr-20020231-2.tgz >> >> Content-Type: >> >> application/x-gzip >> Content-Encoding: >> >> base64 >> >>