RE: User Poll
"PRUCHA,CHAD (HP-Corvallis,ex1)" <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:14:34 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.up2date.current.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have 50 7.0 machines, 60 7.1 machines, 8 7.2 machines, 15 7.3 machines and 10 8.0 machines. The Current server has a filthy tree. So far, all but one have sucessfully updated on the most recent snapshot. This odd duck doesn't produce an error but is clearly out-of-date and yet the client says the system needs no updates. Not a bad success rate, all-in-all, though. --Chad "To me, clowns aren't funny. In fact, they're kind of scary. I've wondered where this started and I think it goes back to the time I went to the circus, and a clown killed my dad." -----Original Message----- From: Matt Gunter [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Current-server] User Poll Hunter Matthews wrote: > Which version of current are your running (1.0.4,1.0.5, 1.4.1): the current snaphot (0.20021011) which works fine. > How many servers do you have: 1 on a RH 7.3 machine > How many clients do you have total: between 20 and 30. > Optional: > What versions and archs are your clients: 7.2, 7.3, and 8.0 running up2date 2.8/3.0 on x86/athlons. I used the 1.0.5 version for a while and it works great but (no offense to the old code) I trust apache a lot more to be the server than the old code. I've used it for years. For those of you worried about configuring it, it is just adding one line to the standard RH apache config. I see no reason to backport or downgrade. Matt _______________________________________________ Current-server mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/current-server