Re: OT: RH end-of-life
Jeremy Portzer <[email protected]> 28 Jan 2003 08:46:43 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.up2date.current.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 06:50, Arthur Clune wrote: > > Ok, a little off-topic, so list-admins feel free to kill the thread, but... > > RH annonced new dates for end-of-life on their products last month > with little fuss. Suddenly it's on The Reg and /. and getting lots of > publicity. > > I'd pretty much pursading people here to start looking at moving > our supported desktops in student classroms from Win2k to RedHat. > > Now with there published 1 year lifetime, it's not looking at all practical. > What do those of you that run desktop systems think? > The end-of-life issue is a problem for me too. I run Linux servers for several "mission-critical" applications, which require even more planning to upgrade/reinstall than desktops. I inquired about Advanced Server for the sole reason that it has a long life cycle, but there is no way to buy it without the expensive support contract. I'm wondering, however, if there won't be third-parties who will continue to make updates for previous Red Hat versions. If there are sites like freshrpms.net that will make security patches available for say, Red Hat 7.3 after Dec 31, this could help us. Obviously you'd need to do your own QA, but this could reduce your work considerably. --Jeremy