Re: Group Policy for port exceptions
Adam Moore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.vnc.ultravnc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For feature requests and bug reports RC15 RC16. Please use the forum at http://forum.ultravnc.net/ Sorry misread your post. ;) Have a look here for different configuration options. Group policy is at the bottom. http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/Customizing-Windows-Firewall.html It looks like you are doing it right. Have you looked in the EventViewer to see if there is a problem with the policy being applied to the machine? Try running gpresult.exe in the command line to make sure the policy is getting applied to the machine. Hope this helps On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:19:18 -0800, Steven Katz <[email protected]> wrote: > For feature requests and bug reports RC15 RC16. Please use the forum at http://forum.ultravnc.net/ > > Thanks, Adam. Could someone explain to me, or point me to an explanation > of the cause of my trouble? Basically, with Windows Firewall turned off, > everything works. When on, I can't connect, and I can't seem to get an > exception policy applied. Is this Group Policy simply ignored? Thanks > again. --Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam > Moore > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:41 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Ultravnc-list] Group Policy for port exceptions > > For feature requests and bug reports RC15 RC16. Please use the forum at > http://forum.ultravnc.net/ > > You can use our free administrative templates to set this policy. Find > it here: > http://www.s-code.com/download_manager.aspx?menu=downloads > > Check under freebies. > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:05:36 -0800, Steven Katz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Several machines (XP SP2) on my network appear to be using non-domain > > Group Policy settings. These machines have editable exception lists > > which allow them to be individually configured to allow port 5900. > > I've been able to control these machines remotely as well as if > > Windows Firewall is turned off. The remaining machines appear to be > > using domain settings (as indicated by the message at the bottom of > > the General tab in Windows Firewall). The Windows Firewall exception > > list is uneditable on these machines so I've been unable to > > individually allow port 5900. Of course, I would prefer to use a Group > > > Policy to configure all machines on the network to allow port 5900, > > but I've been unable to get the policy to work. I tried the following > > with various changes to syntax: ...Network Connections > Windows > > Firewall > Domain Profile (and Standard Profile) > > > 5900:TCP:localsubnet:enabled:VNC > > > > Thanks for any help you can offer! > > > > Steve > > -- > Adam Moore > Public Relations Coordinator > [email protected] > www.s-code.com > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest > Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones > for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idh82&alloc_id148&opclick > -- Adam Moore Public Relations Coordinator [email protected] www.s-code.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idh82&alloc_id148&op=click