Re: Re: "indefensible" WiFi flaw

Mike Kershaw <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.bay-area
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This (and variants) have been known for a year+, and we haven't seen
widespread attacks with it.  If you read the ucal-sandiego paper about
it, many vendors don't even respect RTS/CTS correctly and transmit even
after someone tries to corrupt the carrier.

This might be a concern if someone wanted to create minor havok at a
store or business where wifi is the only communications channel for POS
units or something of that nature, but it's not that scary in general.

-m

On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:26:30PM -0700, Daniel Dobkin wrote:
> I took a look at the AusCert posting for this problem.  It appears to 
> be nothing more than setting a card to send packets continuously, thus 
> setting everyone's carrier sense high and blocking the channel.   The 
> press release maintains that the transmitter 'cannot be located' but 
> this is a mystery to me:  since the transmitter must send continuously 
> to cause a problem, it ought to be quite simple to locate the offending 
> node using raw signal strength or (preferably) a directional antenna 
> and a spectrum analyzer.  For large organizations that are likely to 
> own the space around their network, the offending node would be on 
> their property and could be shut down or asked to leave.  In any case 
> it certainly isn't news:  FCC part 15, "unlicensed devices must accept 
> interference".
> 
> Daniel M. Dobkin
> Enigmatics
> 1-408-314-2769
> [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
> [unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

-- 
"Killing you would be so easy."
"Fried food can kill me.  A mugger can kill me.  You're not that special
 down here."

_______________________________________________
BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAqrpk17KIInOLvbERAv5dAKCyqr/Zv2sUDqqm4mvq+NibtaQs1wCgwaf5
TCrTziMao37/7jO1w1amqAQ=
=t5xd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.