Re: One more step...
"M. Warner Losh" <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Dec 2002 13:36:41 -0700 (MST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.bsd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In message: <3DF86F33.23239.A0007E@localhost>
"Mike Avery" <[email protected]> writes:
: options BRIDGE
This is good.
: wicontrol -i wi0 -s wave
: wicontrol -i wi0 -k 0x0102030405 -v 1
: wicontrol -i wi0 -e 1
: wicontrol -i wi0 -T 1
Use ifconfig here rather than these options. wicontrol in NetBSD
already has removed them, and I plan on doing something similar to
FreeBSD's wicontrol.
: ifconfig wi0 inet up ssid OtherWave mediaopt hostap channel 6
: sysctl net.link.ether.bridge=1
: sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1
I don't think this is required, and may be the source of your
problems. I don't use it and have a very similar setup to what you
have.
: Comms quality/signal/noise: [ 0 81 27 ]
This is meaningless in some ways, since it is the access point. You'd
have to see what the client's signal strenths are.
Warner
--
*bsd wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/bsd-wireless/