Re: virtual wireless interfaces / WDS

In message: <[email protected]>
            Miles Nordin <[email protected]> writes:
: and I'd rather see everything use opportunistic IPsec with
: certificates obtained through DNSSEC, because a lot of encryption
: frameworks are weak in practice because the endpoints are not named in
: a secure fashion.  But this is not the right place to have this
: argument.

I'm hpping that one of the things that sta(4) might allow would be
easier experimentation with alternatives to WEP on a per-station
basis.

I'm happy enough with the design of sta(4) at this point that I'm
sitting back waiting for an implementation that I can play with...
I'm not sure that I like it all, but I don't know enough to clearly
articulate the minor misgivings that I have.  I'll not know if the
issues are real until I can sink my teeth into the implementation...

Warner
--
*bsd wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/bsd-wireless/