Re: Information System

David Young <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.cu-wireless
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:29:50AM -0600, Joe Pickert wrote:
> 
> In that case, even if the off the shelf stuff is deemed unsuitable, I
> would think SNMP would be a better choice than SMTP. Client side libraries
> are small (although "simple" tends to be overused these days) and freely
> available, and any number of existing GUI's and tools could form the basis
> for the informational display.

SNMP would be fine, and we will be writing SNMP MIBs for HSLS and ETX.
Can we get SNMP through a NAT firewall without jumping through hoops?

Dave

> 
> Joe
> 
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Wendy Edwards wrote:
> 
> > We haven't accepted or rejected anything yet.  We're trying to determine
> > what our needs are and what's available.  Thanks for the link!
> > 
> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Joe Pickert wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > Just out of curiosity, is there a reason existing tools
> > > were rejected for this?
> > >
> > > For instance, Nagios Network Monitor, http://www.nagios.org/.
> > > And there are others of course.
> > >
> > > Joe
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CU-Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless
> Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
[email protected]      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933

_______________________________________________
CU-Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless
Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.