Re: [CUWiN] accept FreeNetworks peering agreement?

Sascha Meinrath <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.cu-wireless
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, David Young wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 07:03:46PM -0500, Bryan Cribbs wrote:
> > I have no objections.  Do you know what is needed to
> > satisfy section II.1 ?  (At a brief glance, I could not
> > find examples of what other freenetworks have published
> > on their sites).
>
> Our "network design" document should suffice.  I will ask.
>
> In light of the fact that freenetworks.org members are tunneling to
> each other, we should re-work our IPv4 numbering scheme to use our 10/8
> address reservation at freenetworks.org, 10.24/16.  While we are at it,
> we should make the routes aggregable.  This is really going to pinch
> the hack we use to make IPs out of MACs. :-) Just to stay focused on
> our current development, we should postpone this change until next year.

also, depending on what happens with Harold Feld and IPv6, we may have
"real" IPs available by next year.

--sascha

-- 
Sascha Meinrath
Project Manager & Pres.  *  Project Coordinator  *  Project Manager
Acorn Worker Collective *** CU Wireless Network *** Eggplant Active Media
www.acorncollective.com  *  www.cuwireless.net   *  www.eggplantmedia.com
_______________________________________________
CU-Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless
Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.