Re: [CUWiN] HSLS

On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 10:50:53AM +0800, Jong Hian Zin wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> What is the status of the current HSLS/ETX in the CVS? Probably you
> can tell us what are the things you're going to add/fix before the
> roll out.

Sure.  Here are some outstanding tasks, just off the top of my head:

The HSLS implementation currently uses IPv6 transport to route IPv6,
only.  Before the roll-out, we will make small changes to support IPv4.
A developer is already working on that.

I don't jitter Hello/LSU transmissions.  I think it will be important to
do that to avoid losing a lot of packets to collisions.  Probably before
roll-out.

All the configuration is on the command line, today.  We will add a
configuration file.

We haven't defined an HSLS MIB.

I'm producing add/delete-route commands from the SPF results, now.
Our Zebra interface is finished.  Today I was injecting some routes into
the RIB / FIB via Zebra.  So we're probably about two weeks away from
being able to run some trials on an HSLS/ETX-routed IPv6 network.

Before roll-out, the daemon will be ready to operate efficiently on
semi-broadcast (wireless) and point-to-point networks.  (Someday I will
optimize operation on wired ethernets using techniques borrowed from
IS-IS, but I can postpone that until long after the roll-out.)

There are 16 open PRs for HSLS in our internal bug-tracker.  We anticipate
finding and fixing many bugs between now and our mid-winter benchmark.
Just for example, there is a conceptually simple "bootstrap" process
for the link-state database that was a tad tricky to program; I will
be testing much more carefully in coming weeks.  I will probably find
some bugs.

There is trivial logic for purging old link-states and peers that remains
to be programmed.

Dave

> 
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 18:12:12 -0600, David Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:47:02PM -0500, Gopaul, Richard (Civ, ARL/CISD) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In your release notes it says:
> > >
> > > "The HSLS routing protocol and ETX route metric are not currently used.
> > > "
> > > What routing protocol and route metric do you currently use?
> > 
> > We use OSPF with a hopcount metric.
> > 
> > We are rolling out a larger testbed ahead of completing HSLS/ETX, and
> > OSPF/hopcount performs about as badly as we expected.  So we are looking
> > forward to rolling out a reasonably bug-free HSLS/ETX implementation
> > this winter.
> > 
> > We can roll out sooner with your help!  If you're interested in
> > pitching-in on the development, the sources are available through both
> > CVS and Subversion revision control systems:
> > 
> > Browse CVS: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wireless
> > 
> > CVS checkout:
> > 
> > cvs -d:pserver:anonymous at cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/wireless login
> > cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous at cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/wireless co cuw-trunk
> > 
> > Browse Subversion: http://svn.cuwireless.net/svn/cuw
> > 
> > Subversion checkout:
> > 
> > svn checkout http://svn.cuwireless.net/svn/cuw/trunk
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > --
> > David Young             OJC Technologies
> > [email protected]      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
> > _______________________________________________
> > CU-Wireless mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless
> > Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jong Hian Zin
> _______________________________________________
> CU-Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless
> Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
[email protected]      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
_______________________________________________
CU-Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless
Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org