Re: Wobbly Wi-Fi strives for stability inPortland (The Oregonian)
Tyler Booth <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:31:12 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.portland.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
They use cogent for both, don't have an address off hand though. Tyler Booth // President ph. 503.548.2000 | fx. 503.548.2002 921 SW Washington St, Suite 224 Portland OR 97205 On Sep 4, 2007, at 10:16 AM, Tyler van Houwelingen wrote: > does anyone know the gateway IP addresses that MetroFi is using on > their > Free and Premium (WPA secure) networks? > > ty > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Caleb Phillips" <[email protected]> > To: <general-9Og1/[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 11:55 AM > Subject: Re: [ptp-general] Wobbly Wi-Fi strives for stability > inPortland > (The Oregonian) > > >>> I am curious what you guys think of the MetroFi service in Portland. >> >> I don't think Personal Telco has any one opinion on the matter >> (being an >> all-volunteer-anarchy-of-sorts). >> >> We (by which I mean mostly Jason McArthur) have archived some >> opinions >> and links and stuff like that on the wiki: >> >> http://wiki.personaltelco.net/MetroFi >> >> Also, Russell and I (as most know by now) did an independent (of both >> the City and PTP) survey of the Portland MetroFi proof-of-concept >> network, which lives here: >> >> http://unwirepdx-watch.org >> http://unwirepdx-watch.org/files/report.pdf >> >> However, this is less what we "think" and more what we "learned" >> about >> the network. >> >> Some comments below... >> >>> Wobbly Wi-Fi strives for stability >>> Technology - The city's wireless network's been plagued with >>> technical >>> difficulties and iffy finances >>> Monday, September 03, 2007 >>> MIKE ROGOWAY >>> The Oregonian >>> The dream of cheap, wireless Web access broadcast across whole >>> cities -- >>> a dream nurtured with great fervor around the country last year >>> -- has >>> largely collapsed. >>> >>> In city after city, technical limitations and financial troubles >>> have >>> killed plans to replicate coffee shop Wi-Fi networks on a broad >>> scale. >>> Just last week, plans for networks in Chicago, Houston and San >>> Francisco >>> were scuttled when EarthLink Inc. disbanded its Wi-Fi team. >>> >>> And yet in Portland, the dream survives. >>> >>> Despite eight months of ridicule by bloggers and techies, and >>> scores of >>> complaints from would-be Web surfers who can't connect, Portland's >>> network is proving stubbornly resilient. >> >> Should say "citizen criticism" not "ridicule by techies". >> >>> Data from MetroFi Inc., the California company behind the project, >>> indicate that thousands of people are quietly using the network. >>> It isn't >>> the plug-and-play, universal access of Web surfers' dreams, but >>> it's not >>> an out-and-out failure, either. >> >> Oh, boy, nothing proves success like asking the marketing department! >> >>> "I don't know of any municipal wireless network that has as much >>> usage," >>> said Chuck Haas, MetroFi's chief executive. "Portland is >>> absolutely a >>> success." >>> >>> If Portland is positioned to be the last man standing, though, >>> that's >>> hardly an enviable spot. MetroFi itself acknowledges that free Wi-Fi >>> alone won't satisfy its investors, and is exploring alternatives >>> that >>> include more robust technologies and paid services. >>> >>> Others say that Portland's plan was fatally flawed and that it's >>> impossible to use Wi-Fi to build a citywide network that's both >>> profitable and reliable. >> >> Perhaps they were focusing on the wrong kind of profit. >> >>> Portland should start over with a community-oriented approach >>> focused on >>> bringing wireless access to individual neighborhoods, said Michael >>> Weinberg, president of the volunteer group Personal Telco Project. >> >> Yay, Mike! >> >>> Personal Telco popularized Wi-Fi in Portland by setting up dozens >>> of free >>> hot spots in cafes and bars around the city and helped inspire >>> the city's >>> network. The group's members quickly turned against the effort >>> and are >>> now among its most vocal critics. >> >> Wrong again. We didn't "turn against it", we're just concerned and >> vocal >> citizens. >> >>> "Personal Telco Project was able to do a lot of stuff because we're >>> volunteers," he said. "That gives us a huge advantage in terms of >>> accomplishing a lot of things." >>> >>> A rough start >>> >>> MetroFi won Portland's contract in the summer of 2006 by offering >>> what >>> seemed an unbeatable deal: free Wi-Fi for nearly all of Portland, >>> with no >>> financial commitment from the city. The startup planned to pay >>> for its >>> network with 1-inch banner ads that appear across Web browsers while >>> users are online, and from other wireless subscriptions it hoped >>> the city >>> would buy. >>> >>> The first phase went online downtown in December. Troubles were >>> immediately apparent, as coverage was spotty in some areas and >>> all but >>> unavailable indoors. Many users were surprised to learn that MetroFi >>> recommends a $100 signal booster indoors to overcome the >>> limitations of >>> low-powered Wi-Fi signals. >>> >>> Negative reviews followed, distributed coast-to-coast by National >>> Public >>> Radio and The Associated Press. The AP labeled Portland's network >>> "frustrating" after repeated, unsuccessful attempts to log on. >>> Portland >>> bloggers and technologists have been considerably less kind, >>> offering >>> expletives and other scorn to describe connection problems. >>> >>> Still, MetroFi persists. The Portland network is now about 25 >>> percent >>> complete, and MetroFi says it expects to cover nearly all of >>> Portland by >>> this time next year as its contract with the city requires. >>> >>> While network performance is certainly erratic overall, in >>> certain places >>> close to network antennas -- and even some places indoors -- >>> access is >>> dependable and fast. For many people, apparently, that's enough. >>> >>> MetroFi reports the number of people online has climbed from >>> about 4,300 >>> a month at the start of the year to more than 17,300 in August. >>> Those >>> folks spent an average of nearly 15 hours on the network last month, >>> MetroFi says. >>> >>> But the question remains whether even a growing user base will >>> make the >>> project work financially. >>> >>> An analysis by The Oregonian of MetroFi's business model suggests >>> that, >>> if the company's data is accurate, advertising could support the >>> network >>> once it's fully built. But returns would likely be modest. >>> >>> Even if usage rates don't grow, MetroFi could expect about 70,000 >>> regular >>> users each month when its network is complete. Assuming the >>> amount of >>> time users spend online remains constant, they would generate as >>> many as >>> 1 billion page views a year, and at least $5 million in advertising >>> revenue annually. >>> >>> In July, MetroFi reached agreement with Microsoft and a >>> California online >>> ad company called JiWire Inc. to supply advertising for the Portland >>> network. A recent check of ads running on the Portland network >>> showed a >>> number of national advertisers have bought space, including >>> Monster.com, >>> Verizon Wireless and Wells Fargo. >>> >>> Factoring in some unsold advertising space, network operating >>> expenses >>> and the $10 million it cost to build the network, MetroFi could >>> break >>> even within a few years. >>> >>> While agreeing generally with that analysis, CEO Haas indicated >>> that his >>> company's venture capital backers are looking to do more than >>> break even. >>> >>> So to supplement its free Wi-Fi network, MetroFi wants to develop >>> two >>> other sources of income: selling subscriptions to a faster wireless >>> network to business customers and to government agencies. >>> >>> "To get the investment community to fund these networks it >>> requires all >>> three revenue streams," Haas said. >>> >>> Potential and problems >>> >>> Just a year ago, cities all over the country envisioned wireless >>> futures. >>> Wi-Fi, immensely popular as a convenient way for connecting to >>> the Web in >>> homes and cafes, seemed to offer the promise of a low-cost >>> network that >>> could make fast Web connections broadly accessible on the cheap. >>> >>> But things haven't worked out. National interest in municipal Wi- >>> Fi is >>> flagging and network performance lagging, said Daryl Schoolar, >>> networking >>> analyst for the research firm In-Stat. He said MetroFi and other >>> wireless >>> contractors have no choice but to seek alternatives to the public >>> networks they originally planned. >>> >>> Wi-Fi, which has difficulty penetrating walls and reaching past >>> radio >>> interference, may never be a credible technology for broad access, >>> Schoolar said. >>> >>> "There seems to be a lot of fluctuation in the performance of these >>> networks," he said. >>> >>> Trying to check the industry's troubled economics, MetroFi has >>> teamed >>> with EasyStreet Online Services Inc., a venerable Internet service >>> provider based in Beaverton, to start offering more robust wireless >>> subscriptions to business customers in Portland. >>> >>> And earlier this year, MetroFi decided to stop building municipal >>> networks unless cities agree to be an "anchor tenant," committing >>> to pay >>> a specified amount to subscribe to wireless access. Portland made >>> no such >>> commitment, but MetroFi later dropped plans to build networks in >>> Ohio and >>> Alaska after cities in those states balked at committing any funds. >>> MetroFi still has projects under way in Illinois and California. >>> >>> Looking at the future >>> >>> MetroFi says it remains committed to free Wi-Fi in Portland, and >>> the city >>> remains >> >> "Free-as-in-ads" >> >>> "I think that's a business model that can ultimately work," said >>> Portland >>> city Commissioner Dan Saltzman, whose office led efforts to bring >>> citywide Wi-Fi to Portland. >>> >>> Portland will evaluate MetroFi's progress more fully at the end >>> of the >>> year, Saltzman said, though he anticipates that MetroFi will >>> continue >>> building the network whatever the city concludes. If necessary, >>> Saltzman >>> said, he would be open to finding ways to supplement MetroFi with >>> other >>> wireless services in areas where coverage is inadequate. >>> >>> "If we decide this isn't right for us, or vice versa, we'll maybe >>> look at >>> some more homegrown options as well," he said. >> >> Wow. Great! Saltzman++. That's the most political affirmation of >> community wireless in Portland that I've heard, in, well, forever. I >> guess at some point they have to admit that it works :). >> >>> Mike Rogoway: 503-294-7699, [email protected], >>> http://blog.oregonlive.com/siliconforest/ >> >> -- >> Caleb Phillips >> >> -- >> The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ >> Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate >> Un/Subscribe: http://lists.personaltelco.net/mailman/listinfo/ >> general/ >> Archives: http://news.gmane.org/ >> gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ >> Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/ >> MailingListEtiquette >> > > -- > The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ > Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate > Un/Subscribe: http://lists.personaltelco.net/mailman/listinfo/ > general/ > Archives: http://news.gmane.org/ > gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ > Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette > -- The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate Un/Subscribe: http://lists.personaltelco.net/mailman/listinfo/general/ Archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette