Re: Legality of Packet Sniffing
coderman <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:47:43 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.portland.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/23/07, Caleb Phillips <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought some people here might be interested in this, since it has > come up in discussions (both on-list and over-beers) in the past. The > following paper is going to appear at IMC'07 in a couple of days. It > details the legal issues associated with doing measurement-driven > research on networks (i.e. sniffing and then studying). Although the > paper is targeted at the specific questions of the CS research > community, I think the legal discussion can be mapped to "hobbyist > sniffers" (i.e. war-drivers et al.) too: there's a big difference with respect to wireless networks that is not explicitly detailed in this paper, but is of paramount importance: it is perfectly legal to sniff unencrypted wireless networks. the legal ambiguities come into play concerning disclosure of that data in whole or in part. 0. Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 U.S.C. § 2511 "(g) It shall not be unlawful under this chapter or chapter 121 of this title for any person— _(i) to intercept or access an electronic communication made through an electronic communication system that is configured so that such electronic communication is readily accessible to the general public; _(ii) to intercept any radio communication which is transmitted— ... __(III) by a station operating on an authorized frequency within the bands allocated to the amateur, citizens band, or general mobile radio services; _(v) for other users of the same frequency to intercept any radio communication made through a system that utilizes frequencies monitored by individuals engaged in the provision or the use of such system, if such communication is not scrambled or encrypted. " http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002511----000-.html 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(g)(v) (2004) 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1)(a). anyone who suggests there is a legal basis for "expectation of privacy" on public wireless network is not only incorrect, but actively perpetuating harmful misinformation that is detrimental to the privacy of users on these networks. best regards, -- The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate Un/Subscribe: http://lists.personaltelco.net/mailman/listinfo/general/ Archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette